Defence Minister Khawaja Asif’s statement describing jailed former Prime Minister Imran Khan as a “proxy” for pro-Israel supporters raises serious concerns about the potential international agendas linked to Khan. The allegations suggest that foreign backing for Khan comes from nations historically aligned with Zionist policies. Asif’s claim aligns with Pakistan’s broader apprehensions about external influences compromising its sovereignty.
Imran Khan’s past connections further fuel these suspicions. His ties to Jemima Goldsmith, whose family is closely associated with global elite circles, have often been a subject of political debate. Khawaja Asif’s mention of “Operation Goldsmith,” allegedly orchestrated by Jemima’s brother Zac Goldsmith, paints a picture of a hidden network pushing for Khan’s return to power to serve a foreign agenda. Zac’s dismissal of these claims as “very Jewish” inadvertently adds a layer of complexity to the narrative.
The defence minister also highlighted the silence of these pro-Israel nations on the plight of Palestinians. This double standard raises valid questions about their motivations in advocating for Khan. The fear is that a return of Imran Khan to power could lead to decisions that jeopardize Pakistan’s nuclear security and strategic autonomy.
Asif’s allegations resonate with the ruling coalition’s stance that Pakistan’s political matters are domestic issues. They reject foreign interference and caution against aligning with agendas that could destabilize the country. His warnings about Pakistan potentially becoming a client state under foreign influence serve as a stark reminder of the need to safeguard national interests against covert threats.
In light of these claims, it is crucial to critically examine Imran Khan’s alliances and question the motives of his international backers. National security and sovereignty should remain the priority in Pakistan’s political landscape.
