Pakistan’s decision to join the Board of Peace (BoP) for Gaza has sparked intense debate domestically, but it must be viewed through the lens of Pakistan’s unparalleled experience in peacekeeping and security oversight. While critics decry the move as sitting alongside Israel and compromising decades of principled support for Palestine, a closer examination reveals a strategic opportunity for Islamabad to safeguard the lives and livelihoods of 2.3 million Gazans. The BoP is not a traditional UN initiative. It is a technocratic, executive-led body dominated by Western powers, Israel, and key regional actors. It oversees reconstruction funds, governs infrastructure projects, and…
Author: Web Desk2
The 2025 Turkish Drug Report exposes what Pakistan has long suspected: the Taliban regime in Afghanistan is no longer a dysfunctional or isolated authority it is a strategically organized narco-state, embedding itself in international crime networks while destabilizing the region. Despite their publicized claims of banning poppy cultivation and narcotics trade, the Taliban have not dismantled their drug machinery; they have perfected it, turning illicit substances into a tool of economic leverage and regional destabilization. Afghanistan under the Taliban is exporting instability on a scale that directly threatens Pakistan. The report makes it abundantly clear that drug flows are no…
For too long, regulatory reform in Pakistan has been framed as something demanded by outsiders. Every time European investors raise concerns about predictability, taxation, or enforcement, the conversation slips into a defensive posture, as if reform were a price Pakistan must pay to be taken seriously. This framing is not only inaccurate, it is damaging. Regulatory reform is not submission to Europe or compliance with foreign pressure. It is an assertion of state authority. The EU–Pakistan Business Forum 2026 brings this contradiction into sharp focus. European capital is not held back by a lack of interest in Pakistan. It is…
Afghanistan before August 2021 was not a success story. It was fragile, aid-heavy, distorted, and deeply dependent on foreign assistance. Corruption was real, governance was uneven, and the economy survived more on international patience than internal strength. But despite all its flaws, it was still a state. It had institutions, however weak. It had systems, however inefficient. It had rules that could be navigated, challenged, and improved. Before 2021, Afghanistan’s economy was institutionally legible. Budgets existed. Ministries functioned. Salaries were paid with some regularity. The central bank operated within global financial norms. Private businesses, especially in telecom, construction, transport, and…
Mir Yar Baloch claims that Pakistan has destroyed mosques, burned holy texts, and abducted clerics in Balochistan. These allegations are not only baseless but are part of a coordinated foreign propaganda campaign aimed at maligning Pakistan and destabilizing the region. The reality is clear: Mir Yar Baloch is not a representative of the Baloch people. He operates from India, without any mandate, and his statements are amplified by Indian media and social networks. This is a textbook case of information warfare, designed to fabricate outrage and portray Pakistan as an oppressor. Furthermore, his narrative ignores the brutal reality on the…
Pakistan’s political crisis is often described as a clash between institutions and “the people.” This framing is dishonest. What we are witnessing is not organic dissent crushed by authority, but a deliberately constructed digital ecosystem, largely aligned with PTI, that converts outrage into revenue and political leverage. Since 2022, PTI has not functioned like a conventional political party. It has operated like a distributed media network, with overseas YouTubers, monetized X accounts, Telegram channels, and WhatsApp cells acting as narrative enforcers. Their objective is not reform, accountability, or policy debate. It is delegitimization by saturation. This distinction matters, because PTI’s…
The unfolding discussions between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey signal a historic recalibration of regional security. While the headlines often highlight budgets, aircraft, or drones, the true force anchoring this emerging alliance is Pakistan’s military doctrine a body of strategic wisdom forged over decades of real-world conflict. Pakistan is not merely contributing troops or hardware; it is providing the intellectual framework that guides the alliance’s operations, planning, and deterrence logic. From the mountains of Kashmir to the deserts along its western frontier, Pakistan’s armed forces have repeatedly demonstrated the ability to manage full-spectrum security challenges, balancing conventional warfare, counterinsurgency, and…
The resurgence of violence along Afghanistan’s northern frontier is not an accident of weak governance or a temporary lapse in border control. It is the natural outcome of a system that was never designed to transition from insurgency to statehood. The Taliban’s return to power did not end conflict; it merely changed its geography. What is unfolding along the Tajik border reveals a deeper truth: the Taliban’s survival depends on keeping militancy alive. For more than two decades, the Taliban functioned not as a governing entity but as a coalition of armed networks bound together by ideology, battlefield loyalty, and…
When a state is judged, it should be judged first on whether it keeps its people alive. Everything else follows from that single obligation. Education, mobility, expression, and economic activity all collapse when violence is allowed to dictate daily life. This is the context in which Tirah must be discussed, not as a political talking point, but as a question of law and responsibility. The attempt to frame security operations in Tirah as a human rights crisis deliberately avoids the central issue. For years, armed groups treated the region as a permissive space, enforcing fear, controlling movement, and deciding who…
International law exists to restrain power, not to accommodate it. Its credibility is tested not when states comply out of convenience, but when restraint is demanded at moments of strategic temptation. India’s recent posture on the Indus Waters Treaty represents precisely such a test, one it is increasingly failing. For over six decades, the Indus Waters Treaty has survived wars, political ruptures, and regional crises because it institutionalized predictability between two hostile neighbors. It was designed to remove water from the domain of coercion and insulate civilian life from political retaliation. The treaty’s endurance has often been cited as proof…