The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has often found itself at the center of controversies, accused of manipulating narratives to garner public sympathy. One such instance arose during their protest in Islamabad, where claims of firing and mass casualties were made. However, a closer look at the facts reveals glaring inconsistencies in PTI’s narrative.
The alleged firing incidents reportedly surfaced between 8:30 pm and 9:00 pm, coinciding with the sudden departure of PTI leadership from the protest site. Interestingly, no reports of violence or firing were made prior to this timeline. PTI’s own social media platforms remained silent about any such incidents before this period. The abrupt reporting of “dozens of killings” raises critical questions. If these events had truly unfolded, why was there no immediate acknowledgment or documentation?
This timeline inconsistency points toward a deliberate attempt to create chaos and shift blame after the leadership conveniently exited the scene.
Lack of Evidence: Journalists, Security Forces, and PTI Workers
More than 100 journalists were present at D-Chowk and its surroundings during the protest. None of them reported witnessing any firing or casualties. In an age where real-time updates dominate the media, the absence of even a single credible journalist’s account corroborating PTI’s claims is telling. These professionals, known for their vigilance and dedication to reporting, would have undoubtedly captured and shared any such incidents if they had occurred.The silence of journalists on this matter directly challenges the authenticity of PTI’s narrative.
Before November 26, the government had categorically stated that no Rangers, Frontier Corps (FC), or police personnel deployed at D-Chowk carried firearms. Daily media briefings further reinforced this fact, with officials inviting journalists to present evidence of any armed personnel on duty. Despite these open challenges, PTI has failed to produce a single piece of evidence showing armed law enforcement officers at the site.
If the security forces were unarmed, the question arises: who could have fired the alleged shots? The absence of armed personnel among the deployed forces dismantles PTI’s claims, making them appear baseless.
Thousands of PTI workers were present on Jinnah Avenue during the protest, many equipped with smartphones. Yet, no videos or photos of alleged firing or injuries have been shared, even by PTI’s own supporters. This lack of evidence further weakens the credibility of PTI’s claims, suggesting an orchestrated effort to fabricate the story post facto.
